Updated October 20, 2026

Best Fractional CFO Firms in United States, Remote Delivery

Fractional CFOs serving clients in the United States through remote delivery.

Scored against our public methodology.

#FirmBest forPriceScoreLinks
1Kruze Consulting
San Francisco, CA
Remote delivery model, dedicated team and recurring cadence are documented for the defined startup ICP.$650-$2k/mo
82
/ 100
Visit site
2Zabella
San Francisco, CA
The practice states national service and direct remote access, providing a credible broad remote fit.$3k-$9k/mo
80
/ 100
Visit site
3Magnano Advisory
Gilbert, AZ
Gilbert, Arizona practice led by Scott Magnano. Published retainers start at $6,000 a month. OptimizeRx put the Medicx Health price at $95 million.$6k-$28k/mo
75
/ 100
Visit site
4Burkland
San Francisco, CA
U.S.-wide and beyond service geography, dedicated leads and portal/email access support remote delivery for startup clients.$2k-$4k/mo
72
/ 100
Visit site
51CFO
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix firm founded in 2019 by Dan Emery. Published CFO range of $3,000 to $15,000 a month. He is the only person the firm names.$3k-$15k/mo
63
/ 100
Visit site
6Driven Insights
Boston, MA
Boston and Wilmington mailing addresses, founded in 2014. Most engagements run $3,000 to $8,000 per month.$3k-$8k/mo
60
/ 100
Visit site
7Ignition Consultants
Dedham, MA
Lists a Dedham, Massachusetts address, says it is headquartered in Greater Boston, and serves clients across the United States. Pricing is quote-only. Homepage scale figures are company-reported.Undisclosed
54
/ 100
Visit site
8Preferred CFO
Salem, UT
Salem, Utah firm operating since 2013. A market range of $3,000 to $10,000 per month, scored here as a firm estimate.$3k-$10k/mo
45
/ 100
Visit site

Firms on this page are ordered by the overall score in the Score column, using the public methodology. That score stays the same on every page. Rank changes because the set of firms on each page changes. The firm with the highest score on this page is first. Tied scores keep the earlier listing order.

Last verified 2026-10-07. View changelog
  • 2026-09-11Initial ranking published (editorial scoring).
  • 2026-09-23Replaced with evidence-based scoring and placements from a sourced research review (89 cited sources across 11 firms).
  • 2026-10-07Added newly scored firms. Existing firm scores were left unchanged.
  • 2026-10-07Ordered the page by each firm's overall score. Existing firm scores were left unchanged.
  • 2026-10-07Restated placement notes in direct language. Scores and order were left unchanged.